Perspective of the perspective
as a beginning philosopher, I suggest that you just stop trying to formulate arguments altogether and just soak in knowledge. You are putting the cart ahead of the horse here. You should be reading a lot and writing down necessary truths so that you can use them as a foundation for your own philosophy. This proof above is rooted in a faulty premises. Premise #1 isn’t necessarily true, because if man were not, existence would still be because man is not eternal and something cannot come from nothing. Also, #2 is True, #3 may have been true at one time, but cannot be true now that man exists. And #4 is false, if existence is not, man cannot be because man exists. It doesn’t matter if he is being deceived or not, for if he is, he is being deceived by an entity that exists and not a non-existent entity. The argument based on context is incoherent. I am not sure what exactly your are trying to achieve here? Also, I’m not sure why you are using the word “context” here? Do you means Bei...