Answer 1

-

Your answers are contradictory. Dictionary definitions are flawed. //reality -the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them.// see in this definition of reality, illusions are also real because they are not outside of the world.... Reality should be not be consisting of illusions... If it is full of illusions, then it can not be called as Reality... i want to see your point of view on Reality that really makes sense. ........................................................................................................----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.///Things that can deceive the senses are real phenomena. Are you suggesting that God is just an illusion ? // ----->>>> Wtf... you are calling deception as real phenomena...i want clear difference between reality and illusion. Dictionary definition are flawed. and difference should not be only between words, you should differentiate between interpretation of both the words. God is independent of senses and it is defined as Infinite, Unchanging, eternal, omnipresent, infinite reality of the universe. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------/// I have zero memories of God. I have memories of people telling me about some Bible stories and the Judeo Christian Religions. Again memories are real as they exist in the brain but they can be about real things or imaginary things or things that we do not know are real or imagined. /// ----->>>>>you see, imaginations and fictions are not separate from memory... As memory is real from your point of view, so all the fictions and imaginations also become real.... God is infinite, unchanging and omnipresent Consciousness. Now you have memory of God.... You can't say you have zero memories of God. 😂 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

///We look at the evidence. Without lapsing into solipsism where we are all just brains in a vat (in which case you can't show God either) we have to assume that reality exists and we can interact with and learn it. We then develop ways through the scientific method and philosophy and testing to overcome our biases to evaluate truth./// -->>>>>>>>But evidence is perceived by five senses... You have to tell me how do you know that your five senses are real and not deception? We can't assume that the reality exists.. All the things become useless if we are in illusion and do not have idea of what reality is.. and I am not into solipsism. Philosophy of solipsism does not suggest further inquiry. I do not agree with them.  i do not need to prove God. God is eternal and infinite reality of consciousness. It stands self proved even in case of Brain in Vat.... For the Brain in Vat to exist, Consciousness has to exist... 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Important Scriptures

-
  Bhagavad Gita, Brahmsutras, Isha Upanishad, Kena  Upanishad ,  Katha Upanishad,  Prashan Upanishad,  Mundaka Upanishad,  Mandukya Upanishad,  Tattiriya Upanishad,  Aitareya Upanishad,  Chhandogya Upanishad   Brihadaranyaka Upanishad Tripitakas (Triple Baskets, one of them is Abhidhamma-pitaka- which includes Philosophical teachings)., Diamond sutra, Lotus Sutra, Heart Sutra, The Jewel Heap Sutra, The Lankavatara Sutra, The Heroic Gate (Shurangama) Sutra, The Brahma Net (Brahmajala) Sutra, Flower Garland Sutra (The Avatamsaka) Sutra, The Great Perfection of Wisdom (Maha Prajnaparamita) Sutra, The Pure Land Sutras, The Vimalakirti Sutra, Sandhinimocana Sutra, Amitabha Sutra, Mahaparinirvana Sutra. Abhidharmakosa Karika (highest Knowledge)
Read more

This universe doesn't exist unless if we are observing it

-
That solves the fermi paradox and has in its back the general relativity and the double slit providing the influence of observation on our reality Plato is correct about abstract forms beyond our existential experience like infinity Relativity goes deeper than we can imagine it gets into our subjective experience with the universe making it our mere creation theory of "relative observetism" There is the "unknown" realm this thing if it's a thing is no matter it's beyond the observer notation or even comprehension it cannot be observed thus described in detail yet it's possible to comprehend on abstract level as it is in its "normal" state and will change or form based on an observer ! When observed it's subjective form holds an experience for the observer a universe is shaped based on this type of observation in the realm of the unknown there is no such thing as a "verse" or gravity these all results of observational typology real
Read more

Can memory be called as fictional ?

-
What kind of evidence exactly do atheists want? What will atheists conclude after getting the evidence? How do atheists define reality relative to imaginary, and reality relative to illusion? They should be able to apply their point of view on reality to all the mental elements and material elements.  If all that exists is real and illusions also exist, then all the illusions become reality, can all the illusions be called reality? If I imagine the Eiffel tower, does imagining make it unreal? If it is real, then imaginations cannot be necessarily called non-existent.  God also exists in the form of memory, and God is not different from memory. So if God is fictional, then can memory be called fictional and imaginary? But, we all have memory, so how can it be called fictional? What is different between existence and non-existence, and reality and illusion from an atheist's point of view?  How do you define Reality as opposed to imaginary, and Reality as opposed to illusion? 
Read more